Lawyers use precedent documents all the time. Outsiders may say it’s done out of laziness, but there’s much more to it. Here are three reasons why precedent documents are your friend when rethinking your board committee charters and corporate governance guidelines:

1. Tap into knowledge of peers – Maybe another company has a governance practice that seems like a good idea for your board to add to its arsenal. Or maybe your board already has been engaging in that practice but it’s not evident from your governance documents.

2. They improve drafting quality – Maybe another company has been better at articulating the same practice as it’s described in their governance document. Being a better communicator through your governance documents can be important for shareholder engagement and to bring in the vote come annual meeting time.

3. Understanding market trends can inform negotiation strategy – Speaking of shareholder engagement, if you review a number of governance documents from other companies and they don’t have the kind of provision that an investor seeks, that might help build your case if it’s something you want to push back on.

For all the same reasons that lawyers depend on “what’s market” when negotiating deal documents, relying on “what’s market” in governance documents might help you be persuasive.

And here are two reasons why you shouldn’t overly rely on precedent documents when rethinking your own governance documents:

1. Your governance documents should reflect actual practice – There’s nothing worse than including a practice in one of your governance documents because it’s seemed like a good thing to do – but your board doesn’t actually do it. Go through every inch of your governance documents and ensure that your board really does undertake every action, practice and task mentioned.

2. Your governance document should be a real, breathing document – The point above is so important that it bears repeating, perhaps in a different way. It’s important to regularly vet your governance documents – at least once a year – and ensure that they cover the actions, practices and tasks that your board undertakes right now. Remember to remove things that the board used to do – but doesn’t anymore.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Broc Romanek Broc Romanek

As a strategist for the firm’s Corporate & Securities practice, Broc Romanek has a deep understanding of the regulatory and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) marketplace. Prior to joining Perkins Coie, Broc served as editor at TheCorporateCounsel.net, CompensationStandards.com, and DealLawyers.com, where he oversaw…

As a strategist for the firm’s Corporate & Securities practice, Broc Romanek has a deep understanding of the regulatory and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) marketplace. Prior to joining Perkins Coie, Broc served as editor at TheCorporateCounsel.net, CompensationStandards.com, and DealLawyers.com, where he oversaw and managed coverage on issues related to ESG, corporate governance, executive pay, deals, and market trends and analysis.

In addition to his nearly two decades of working as a journalist and publisher, Broc served as assistant general counsel at a Fortune 50 company, worked in the Office of Chief Counsel of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance, was a counselor to former SEC Commissioner Laura Unger, and worked in private practice. He also is the author, or co-author, of four legal treatises, and has authored several books focused on the legal industry.

Photo of Jacob Hasler Jacob Hasler

Jacob Hasler is a knowledge management (KM) attorney supporting the firm’s business practices, specifically Corporate & Securities, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Emerging Companies & Venture Capital. As a KM attorney, Jacob helps capture and organize the firm’s institutional knowledge in ways that ensure

Jacob Hasler is a knowledge management (KM) attorney supporting the firm’s business practices, specifically Corporate & Securities, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Emerging Companies & Venture Capital. As a KM attorney, Jacob helps capture and organize the firm’s institutional knowledge in ways that ensure the efficient delivery of high-quality legal services. This involves managing the creation and upkeep of legal templates, automating documents, improving workflows, vetting and implementing KM technology tools, and pursuing other information sharing initiatives. Prior to taking on his current role, Jacob was an associate in the firm’s Business practice.