Recently, I blogged about a Supreme Court case – West Virginia v. EPA – that may have implications for the SEC’s rulemaking authority going forward. When you layer the SEC’s recent rule changes to unwind proxy advisor regulations that only took effect a few years ago – and the lawsuit that has now been filed in the wake of that – we have an unsteady regulatory environment that seemingly will continue to shift due to political tailwinds more than any other time in the SEC’s history.  

What happens when there is such a regulatory void? One possible answer is some degree of uncertainty and perhaps chaos. Another possible answer could be more private ordering than what we now have today. Both may well become our reality.

“Private ordering” is when market forces help to dictate the parameters of what companies decide to implement as part of their own internal codes and policies. In most cases, “market forces” in the corporate governance context means that large institutional investors – as well as the proxy advisors – place pressure on companies to adopt provisions in their charters, bylaws or corporate governance guidelines (or perhaps even adopt standalone policies), or merely make public disclosures, that align with positions that are championed by these stakeholders.

The growth of private ordering and the increasing importance of shareholder engagement have emerged hand-in-hand as the darlings of today’s corporate governance world. Just as private ordering kept proxy access alive when the SEC’s efforts to adopt proxy access rules floundered for many years, it would seem that private ordering will be the driving force to fill the regulatory void that we may face in the coming years.

The rub is how effective will that private ordering be when the resolutions may not be all that simple? For proxy access, it was pretty clear what the desired result should look like from most quarters. It may not be so easy going forward in areas like climate change where investors might not be so aligned on what they seek and industry – and individual company – situations tend to fall all over the map.

Leadership will be of paramount importance to get it right and there is reason to be concerned that various parties don’t place enough trust in others so that we don’t wind up making the world a better place.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Broc Romanek Broc Romanek

As a strategist for the firm’s Corporate & Securities practice, Broc Romanek has a deep understanding of the regulatory and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) marketplace. Prior to joining Perkins Coie, Broc served as editor at TheCorporateCounsel.net, CompensationStandards.com, and DealLawyers.com, where he oversaw…

As a strategist for the firm’s Corporate & Securities practice, Broc Romanek has a deep understanding of the regulatory and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) marketplace. Prior to joining Perkins Coie, Broc served as editor at TheCorporateCounsel.net, CompensationStandards.com, and DealLawyers.com, where he oversaw and managed coverage on issues related to ESG, corporate governance, executive pay, deals, and market trends and analysis.

In addition to his nearly two decades of working as a journalist and publisher, Broc served as assistant general counsel at a Fortune 50 company, worked in the Office of Chief Counsel of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance, was a counselor to former SEC Commissioner Laura Unger, and worked in private practice. He also is the author, or co-author, of four legal treatises, and has authored several books focused on the legal industry.