Digging further into the SEC’s proposing release for climate disclosure, the SEC’s proposal would elicit disclosure about a company’s internal carbon price – for those companies that do that sort of thing. [Compare that to how companies would be required to disclose carbon offsets under the SEC’s proposal, as noted in this blog.]

Some companies use an internal carbon price to as a planning tool for considering climate-related risks and opportunities, and to quantify costs, and guide investment decisions. For some companies, use of an internal carbon price may be an alternative to conducting scenario analysis planning.


The Disclosure Requirements

As noted on pages 79-80 of the proposing release, proposed Item 1502(e) of Regulation S-K would require disclosure about:

– Price in units of the company’s reporting currency per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent (“CO2e”)
– Total price, including how the total price is estimated to change over time
– Boundaries for measurement of overall CO2e on which the total price is based (if different from the GHG emission organizational boundary)
– Rationale for selecting the price used
– How the company uses its disclosed internal carbon price to evaluate and manage climate-related risks


More Than One Internal Carbon Price

If a company uses more than one internal carbon price, the SEC’s proposal would require it to provide disclosures for each internal carbon price – and to disclose its reasons for using different prices.  The SEC gives the example of a company disclosing that it uses different internal carbon prices when considering various scenarios to help it develop a business strategy over different time horizons.


Forward-Looking Information Inevitable

This is another disclosure that inevitably would result in more forward-looking information being made publicly available. The PSLRA safe harbors would apply – but the upshot is there is a risk that these types of disclosures could wind up disincentivizing companies from establishing internal carbon prices.


Here are our other blogs about the SEC’s climate proposal so far:

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Allison Handy Allison Handy

Allison Handy is the firmwide co-chair of the Corporate & Securities practice. Her extensive experience includes advising public and private companies in connection with corporate governance practices, disclosure issues, and capital markets transactions, such as equity offerings, debt offerings and tender offers. She…

Allison Handy is the firmwide co-chair of the Corporate & Securities practice. Her extensive experience includes advising public and private companies in connection with corporate governance practices, disclosure issues, and capital markets transactions, such as equity offerings, debt offerings and tender offers. She is also a leader of the firm’s Environmental, Social, and Governance advisory team.

Allison provides counsel to companies on a broad range of issues faced by management and directors in connection with the many compliance aspects of securities laws, including governance rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and stock exchanges. She advises boards and committees in matters related to internal investigations and the efforts of shareholder activists, and works closely with in-house counsel, financial personnel, and outside auditors and advisors to help her clients prepare proxy statements and other reports to investors that meet complex disclosure obligations.